MCP Supply Chain and Registry Security
Last updated 144 days ago · Created Apr 10, 2026
Glossary
Input
Run
Verdict
Outcome
Metrics
Methodology
Test cases come from Meta's CyberSecEval, an independent third-party dataset spanning multiple programming languages. Manicode does not author them.
Each test case runs twice against the same model. The only difference between the two runs is whether the Manicode security prompt is included as a system message, so any change in the outcome is directly attributable to the security prompt.
Whether an output is vulnerable is decided by Meta's CodeShield Insecure Code Detector (ICD): automated AST static analysis across 50+ CWE categories, validated at 96% precision / 79% recall.
Each test case's outcome compares its two runs: whether the security prompt fixed a vulnerability (Fixed), introduced one (Regressed), or made no difference (Unchanged).
Prompt Details
- Lines
- 67
- Characters
- 7,007
- Tokens (est)
- ~1,752
Description
Harden MCP ecosystems — curated server registries with cert pinning, signed tool manifests with quarantine, hash-pinned deps with CVE alerting, reproducible CI/CD with cosign, local-server consent dialogs, file-integrity monitoring. Use when managing MCP fleets or vetting community MCP servers.