AI Incident Response and Model Risk Management
Last updated 144 days ago · Created Apr 10, 2026
Glossary
Input
Run
Verdict
Outcome
Metrics
Methodology
Test cases come from Meta's CyberSecEval, an independent third-party dataset spanning multiple programming languages. Manicode does not author them.
Each test case runs twice against the same model. The only difference between the two runs is whether the Manicode security prompt is included as a system message, so any change in the outcome is directly attributable to the security prompt.
Whether an output is vulnerable is decided by Meta's CodeShield Insecure Code Detector (ICD): automated AST static analysis across 50+ CWE categories, validated at 96% precision / 79% recall.
Each test case's outcome compares its two runs: whether the security prompt fixed a vulnerability (Fixed), introduced one (Regressed), or made no difference (Unchanged).
Prompt Details
- Lines
- 61
- Characters
- 8,496
- Tokens (est)
- ~2,124
Description
Design AI incident response and SR 11-7 model risk management — NIST incident taxonomy, confidence/fairness/safety triggers, model rollback and circuit breakers, forensic preservation, EU AI Act/Colorado AG notification, independent validation. Use when building an AI incident or model risk program.